Wednesday, 12 November 2014

Those that were present: Gareth II, Paul, Jon, Tom III, Tom II, Jim, Arturo, Neil, Chris II, Paul II, Dan, Philip

What those played: Coup G54, Trains: Rising Sun, Agricola, Terra Mystica, Cash ’n’ Guns, Castles of Mad King Ludwig, Cash ’n’ Guns II & III, Port Royal, Castles of Mad King Ludwig II

Trains: Rising Sun

With Paul and Jon locking horns on this last week both were keen on a rematch and it was good for myself and Tom II to learn the revised game.

Having been selected start player I took THE best position on the map and there was no way anyone was going to prevent an inevitable victory. Whilst Paul and Jon built up their hands Tom followed my example of laying rails, collecting waste, filling that board up. Everyone had avoided each other pretty well until first Jon started impinging on my borders, and the Paul decided to do the same. As it was I slipped nicely through to pick up one of the town to town bonuses and felt that my empire was going to be strong enough, I just needed one more sets of rails into either  or . But it wasn’t to be. 

Jon had been hoarding the yellow buildings and Paul snuck through some last minute stations. A close game all round but that inevitable victory was on hold..

Final Scores; Jon - 42, Paul - 39, Neil - 38, Tom - 36.

Coup: G54 (Cheers Jon)

An early evening foray into the world of Central American politics - with only Tom (3!) not having played Coup before.

This game saw an interesting mix of cards, as two of them took affect after players had lost lives. The Intellectual could be claimed in order to take 5 coins when losing your first life, and the Lawyer could be used to take all the remaining coins from a player that is eliminated. The other roles were Farmer (take 3 coins and pass 1 on), Newspapers (take a coin and swap a card with the deck) and Judge (give 3 coins to a player and then kill them!).

Tom was the first to depart, after wrongly accusing Gareth of having Newspapers. Philip followed close behind (he likes to play this game fast and loose - bravo!) and then Gareth was 'judged' out of the game by Jon. Neil was the only player claiming the Lawyer' and raked in a fair bit of cash from these eliminations, but a combination of a Coup and a judging by Paul took him out too.

So it was left to Paul and Jon to duke it out, both with 1 role left. Paul had been claiming it was the Judge, which Jon suspected was true, and Paul was also 1 ahead on coins. 

Therefore it seemed a straightforward race to 7 coins and a Coup by Paul. The only slim hope that Jon had was to dive into the deck and hope that he picked up his own Judge, which he could use against Paul's Judge, if Paul chose to use it rather than Coup'ing. And as it turned out, this is exactly what happened - Jon got lucky, picked up a Judge, and was able to successfully claim it when Paul tried to assassinate him.
That almost makes up for Paul winning at Trains last week......almost....

Cash 'n' Guns (thanks again Jon)

6 foam guns, plenty of bravery, some stupidity and a lot of fun.

Game II - Tom II 95; Jon 85; Neil 80; Paul 75; Dan 55
Game III - Jim 85; Neil 85; Tom II 60; Jon 60; Tom III - dead

Port Royal (cheers Jon)

This hasn't been out for a few weeks, but Tom and Jon managed to fudge a reasonable rules explanation together for the other 2 players.

Tom III became Mr Money-Bags, but was then hit with 2 taxations in quick succession, which certainly stymied his immense purchasing power.

Tom II finished the game first, taking himself to 13 points, which only Jon was able to match. The tiebreaker is apparently coins left over, but as neither player realised this until after the count-up, the game was declared an honourable draw.

Jon 13; Tom II 13; Jim 9; Tom III 6

Castles of Mad King Ludwig II

Despite having played the game once already Dan was happy to take on Paul and me for a quackish three-player. Dan didn’t quite go for his downstairs strategy that had won him his earlier game although he did have some nifty room placements to isolate some late purchases of sleep rooms to prevent me from taking one of the King’s Favours.

Paul picked up some good lengths of hallway although it was his outdoor rooms that scored well for him. Despite not being able to pick up on any additional bonus cards - Dan pilfered those successfully - I was able to concentrate on the livings and size 400 rooms that were my main incentive. The living rooms additionally meant I won the King’s Favour of external entrances.

Throughout the game I managed to stay ahead with some juicy points for those living rooms as well as some high paying activity rooms. Final scoring would all be down to those bonus cards. It was tight. It was so tight that Dan and I tied on 82 points each. Tie breaker? Couldn’t remember what it was.. cool, total room size of your castle, surely my bigger tiles had this? Damn, wrong again… Dan’s extensive network of stairs and hallways paid off, his castle was 4,900 square feet, a whole 250 sq foot bigger than mine, double damn!!


Wednesday, 5 November 2014



It’s All A Question of Time

Adventurers;

Paul, James, Jon, Tom II, Jim, Arturo, Neil, Philip, Dan, Paul II.


Games Played;

Trains: Rising Sun, Jaipur, Takamatsu, Council of Verona, Rolling Japan, Imperial Settlers, El Gaucho, Castles of Mad King Ludwig, Jaipur II, Witness, Subdivision.



Topic of the Week;

Length. That is, the time it takes to play a game. Within the IBG there’s a distinct split between those willing to spend up to an hour on one game and those for whom that’s a minimum requirement. No problem, we generally cater for both camps, in abundance. 

I sent a short set of questions round this week to a couple of our group - it’ll be your turn soon, don’t fret! - and here are my findings:

Jon said that he tends ‘to gravitate towards games that last an hour or less - see my previous blog post for details!’ His examples included, Trains, Small World, Kingdom Builder, Libertalia, Coup Guatamala 1954. ‘I sometimes don't mind a longer game, if it's a good co-op and I'm immersed in the theme - step forward Robinson Crusoe and Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective. I think that Paul may have other opinions though, as he genuinely fell asleep during one game of Robinson Crusoe that we played.’

For Jon ‘mechanics also play a big part - cube-pushing really turns me off nowadays whereas I'm being more drawn to 'social interaction' games such as Coup, Mayday Mayday and Saboteur. Throw in a traitor or 2 and I'm as happy as Guy Fawkes.. Theme also makes a difference - for some reason trains seem to float my boat (although I have zero interest in them in real life) - whereas space, fantasy or super-heroes don't do anything for me.’

James replied that he’s happy to play for 60-90 minutes but time is obviously precious for him, ‘not enough time to play games as it is so need to be sure 1) I’m going to like it, and 2) it won't outstay it's welcome... anything over 90
mins starts to feel like a LONG time... If I had a whole day available to
play games though then would be happy to play Twilight Struggle... but this
is rare.’ He listed his favourites as Snowdonia, Fresco, Chinatown, Small World, El Grande.

I know Jon also loves Railways of the World and Tikal and both play well over the hour so I asked what it was about those two that worked for him - ‘ROTW, this game just gives me a buzz. Maybe it's the map, or building routes - I don't know - but I just get a feeling of satisfaction out of playing it. I like the fact that it doesn't get more complicated as the game goes on. Tikal also has a soft spot in my heart. It's one of the first 'proper' games that I bought, and I just love the look of it. Brings back exciting memories of having a game collection in single figures and thinking "Once I get to 10 games, I'll definitely have enough." Hmmmm..’ Don’t worry, we’re all in that boat!

Dan’s response to my questions was very interesting with him considering down-time in all its glory, ‘Time spent on gameplay/interactivity is more important than overall game length to me. A 1 hour game where you spend 45mins looking at your shoes because there is nothing else to do is way more painful to sit through than a 2 hour game where you are invested in each others turns. Being invested in the other player’s turns can be through:
• Interactivity, where what the other players are doing has a direct impact on changing your personal game state/tableau/pieces on the board, or their actions activate things that you have in your play area e.g. Suburbia, Council of Verona
• Shared turns where everybody takes their action at the same time e.g. Diamant
• Decision and response games where the turns are all the same, it is just a different person leading out each turn e.g. Nanuk
• Co-Ops where you manage your own turn while it is still important to discuss the shared strategy and the intent of ones actions in fulfilling the strategic milestones e.g. Sentinels of the Multiverse
• Negotiation/trading/traitor mechanics where watching the other players closely and commenting on their actions is a fundamental part of the gameplay e.g. Battlestar Galactica
• Dynamic planning where I can occupy myself with working out what I need to do in my upcoming actions while the other players take their turns. As a caveat, this sort of game usually goes completely the opposite way with people who struggle with formulating and activating multiple strategic plans, and who wait for their turn to tick around before considering what they will do on that turn e.g. Trains, Imperial Settlers’

Additionally, he touched on two further valid points and I know that Dan II / Natasha is with him all the way on the first of these with his “8-min rule sessions”. As Dan puts it, ‘Rules explanations are also significant. I have gravitated towards games that are straightforward to get started, no matter how complex the emergent gameplay may actually become. If I have to sit through half an hour of rules explanations before I even get started, then I’ve already lost interest. Going against this, I do still like games with complex systems that can be started quickly with detail added as and when situations crop up during play e.g. Pax Porfiriana’

Dan’s second point on player numbers also makes some sense, ‘The number of players also has an impact on game length; I’m leery of joining a five player game of anything unless it’s a genuinely interactive game, short even with lots of players, or preferably both. Three seems to be the magic number with most games, both in terms of interaction as well as game length.’

I asked James about games that go against his preferred time scales, he replied that he ‘loves 15 minute fillers, but couldn't eat a whole one. Machi Koro, The Resistance, Verona, One Night Werewolf, would play more Twilight Struggle if I had the time.’ And other influences for him were, ‘always better when playing games with the crowd that I consider friends, but that feels too cliquey from a club perspective. Would hesitate to play a LONG game with complete strangers... Get frustrated with long down-times between moves...

For myself, as a writer, I love the challenge of trying to hold a story across the length of a novel. Maybe since leaving full time employment I no longer allow deadlines to rule my existence. Both of these factors undoubtedly mean I’m happy to spend as long as possible in playing a board game. Clearly, I’m not going to log as many plays as I would concentrating on the 45 minute game but for me the investment in time is one I can afford. It is testament to the current board game market that there are still many games being produced with an estimated play time of 2 hours or more - I picked up 8 in Essen for instance: Arkwright, Kanban, Fields of Arle, Panamax, Swedish Parliament 2014, Clinic, plus the ‘remixed’ Power Grid Deluxe and a trade for last year’s Madeira. Thankfully too, I only collect games, no expectations of actually playing them!

My final question this week was around James’s recent purchase of, not one but two, game timers. Jon defended his ‘reputation’: ‘Interesting that my (once) justly ascribed reputation for taking my time over game moves still persists, when we actually now have even greater criminals at IBG, including Sinden himself! He might have to be careful, though, that he doesn't find his bleeping cube inserted into one of his bodily cavities at some point.’ 

James himself commented: ‘It has potential... just not sure if the potential is as a game timer or a door stop.’ Top quote!

Reports;

Trains: Rising Sun (Thanks Paul)

Jon and Paul rocked up early and rolled out the new Essen-fresh 2 player Trains board. There were two to choose from and the one they chose turned the game into a bit of a race, with the three starting positions at the bottom of the board, and the routes to complete and big terminal hexes all in the top half.

Jon started off the quickest, beating Paul to some of the juicier cities half way up the board and looking poised to complete what he'd started. 

However a neat one:two combo allowing Paul to spread into multiple hexes with no extra costs on either allowed him to leapfrog Jon right at the top of the board and swoop off to complete both available routes. He then beat the 'master of quick finishes' to his own game by bringing the game to an end first, suspecting but certainly not knowing that he'd got the most points. At the end two points was the difference and pupil beat the master.

Nice combinations of cards and a very different frenzied feel to this game made for yet another completely different game of trains.

Final Scores; Paul won, Jon lost.

Takamatsu

Looking for a quickish 5 player this hit the table for its first run out. ‘Looks like Ludo’ was Paul’s immediate assessment of the board and the samurai figures that start out on their coloured spaces and score only when they circuit the building and return to their colour of room.

In a five player game each player begins with 5 samurai, 3 in the outside rooms, 2 in the inner. 

The rules are simple. You have to move 1 of your own samurai. If there’s 1 samurai on a space he can move 1 space. If there are two they both move 2 spaces. If there’s more than 2 then you have move at least 1 of yours plus 1 of someone else’s (if there is 1 of course) AND you must leave 1 behind.

Early on you keep your own fellows together, but after a while interaction is inevitable. And that’s when it all gets very messy. I scored a couple of early points but from then on in everyone took every opportunity to destroy my moves, dragging my samurais all over the place. Arturo picked up some useful points and Paul made a huge move taking all 5 of his samurais to within 1 space of his room - except it’s then impossible to move only 1 space. And that’s how you get to learn the game.

Except that in concentrating on his own men later on he suddenly left Arturo with the perfect play to get 4 samurai home and to storm the game with the rest of us miles behind! So, a double learning game for Paul.  

Not sure of the final scores, James and Jon did ok but there was no beating Arturo who played nice and steady.

Rolling Japan (Thanks Jon)
James is fresh back from Essen, so what's likely to be in his bag? A Japanese game in a small box of course! And this one doesn't even pretend to be anything else - the clue is in the name…

Paul, Jon and Arturo joined him to find out what it was all about. Basically, players have a scoresheet which has an abstracted 'map' of Japan, divided into coloured sections, and sub-divided into boxes. Coloured dice are rolled, 2 at a time, and players must write these values into a box of the corresponding colour. The trick is, each box must only contain a number which is no more than 1 higher or lower than any neighbour. So, a box with a '4' could only have neighbouring boxes containing a 3,4 or 5. There's also a wild die which can be placed in any colour. If a player can't legally add a number, he must place an 'x' in a box. Fewest x's wins the game.

To report, or even try to remember, how the game played would be an exercise in futility, but suffice it to say that there were a few groans and expletives muttered at different points in the game. The final scores were incredibly close, but no-one is quite sure if that made all the players equally competent, or equally incompetent…

Not a bad game, but I much prefer Qwixx for a quick dice-rolling, number-crossing experience, which has much more of a 'push-your-luck' feel.

Final Scores; James - 17, Arturo - 17, Paul - 18, Jon - 18.

El Gaucho (Thank you Paul!)

Rounding up cows on the Argentine Pampas and selling them for as much profit, by way of some dice rolling, decision making and rustling other players cattle.

A light - mid weight game, part dice rolling, part worker placement and part set collecting.

At the end everyone probably felt they were in with a chance apart from Arturo who proved the eventual winner, adding another win to his successful evening.

Simple and fun.

Final Scores; Arturo - 55, James - 49, Jon - 44, Paul - 42.


Council of Verona (Thanks again Jon)

More Romeo and Juliet shenanigans at the end of the evening. 2 rounds were played by Dan, James, Arturo and Jon. I can't remember the exact scores (not helped by the fact that no-one was writing them down...) but James, Dan and Arturo all scored points each round, and Jon didn't. Enough said.

Jaipur
Dan had taught Paul II how to play this popular game and following Castles as Philip nipped down to the bar Paul kindly taught the game to me. We played a couple of rounds and I managed to score pretty well to win both. A very neat set collection game which plays very smoothly, easy to see why it’s sitting at 101 in the BGG hit parade. And even better I managed to snag a copy from Rakuten for £12 delivered during the week!

Subdivision

Another game I was ‘trained to teach’ at Essen, although I didn’t actually do so. The inevitable comparisons to Suburbia are only going to harm this light weight tile laying game. However, it’s simple to learn, few rules but plenty of strategy and enough going on for a good 45 minute game.

Each round of 4 has players simultaneously drafting 4 ‘zone’ tiles to place on their board. These come in 5 types: civic, commercial, industrial, luxury and residential. If you place one next to an existing tile then you activate that one and are able to add an ‘improvement’ to your board. These come as tiles: lakes, parks, roads or schools, or as wooden sidewalks. 

Initial placement is determined by a roll of the die, although you can pay to override this. Each parcel on your board comes with a minus figure on it from -1 to -3 so you want to cover as many parcels as possible. End game scoring comes in various guises with parks scoring for each connected tile, schools needing to be built 3 tiles high, sidewalks for each different zone they run through multiplied by each different improvement. Each zone scores high points provided it is connected to the main highway by roads or empty land parcels. And money is worth something, but not much.

Tom and Jim were happy to give it a go and were soon in the swing of things. Bonuses are available each round and these influenced Tom into a Park Life strategy while Jim and I both tried building up our roads. All switched to sidewalk building during the second round as the plots of land started filling up, and then schools for round three.

As the parcels get filled the board gets more difficult to complete and you don’t want to be blocking out any zones from roads or the highway. This cost Tom at the end of the game but Jim managed to max out and thus win the game.

Final Scores; Jim - 115, Neil - 104, Tom - 92.

Witness (Cheers James!)

Pssst.... witness.... pssst.... we failed.... psst... to manage even... psst... the beginners cases… Psst... fun game....... psst... not sure we're... psst... clever enough to play it…

in slightly more details. This is a simple, if very unique, game, based around the concept of Chinese whispers. Everyone owns part of a solution to a problem and has to whisper their clues to a neighbour. They then then whisper the clues they've heard and their own clue to their neighbour and so on until all the clues have had a chance to disseminate around the table.

At this point 3 questions are asked on the 'case' and everyone has to work out the answers. If everyone gets all 3 right you did well... if not then you fail... more or less... no prizes for guessing how we did first time through...

So the first case involved some footsteps and a murder in the snow... we all could identify some of the footprints, so initially it all made sense... but then I know I forgot something when I told Dan... which basically scuppered his and our chances... At the end Jon guessed correctly, I got 2 but the rest was disaster.

Case 2 was based around identifying spies around a dinner table... I'm confident I passed on everything correctly here, but somewhere, something went skew-whiff. I managed to identify one spy, but had the names wrong. I don't think anyone was was any more successful...

Case 3 - last one for the evening was a murder with the victim and culprit all sporting Movember moustaches... there was something about a fu-manchu... and bushy tashs... but I wiped out complete on this one... as a team we got 5/12 points.

So.... to conclude the case. We sucked... I'm holding up my hand as someone who sucked at least as badly as anyone else. These were all beginner cases, god help us when we get to the diabolical ones.

As to the game... it's.... different ! It's certainly a filler, each case only lasts about 10 minutes, so you can play a few in a row if time permits. It only plays 4... no more no less, so you need to have the right people around... and also it's bizarre/different enough that not everyone is going to 'get' it... 

For me it feels like a great christmas, post dinner game... and could go down a storm in the right group... preferable after a few drinks.


So, end results... we lost... more Clouseau than Poirot...

Wednesday, 29 October 2014

Lies, damned lies and games reports...

.
Players: James, Paul, Phil, Noel, Andy, Jon, Tom, Soren, Paul II, Tom II, James III, Chris

A good turnout tonight, with a warm welcome to another newcomer, Chris, joining us for the first time – who lives in Wimbledon but rather handily works just down the road at Gillette corner.
With Philip and James having newly returned from Essen, there were always going to be some new goodies on offer, but it was nice to see at least one familiar old title as well.
When reading tonight’s reports, just remember that history may have been re-written on at least one occasion – you have been warned…….

Colt Express (thanks Paul)
Each of the six players took the part of a bandit who boarded the moving train in the rear carriage, trying to avoid the Marshall whilst picking up as much loot as possible and engaging in shootouts and brawls with each other. Each player has various cards with actions on them which will let them move left and right through the train, climb onto the train roof (or back down), move the Marshall, punch or shoot a fellow bandit or pick up loot. The game consists of five rounds, and in round the players add these action cards to the deck in specific order, two, three or four times for everyone. The deck is then a series of actions which those no good cowboys much play out. Therefore the players must attempt to think ahead to anticipate where they will be on the train by the time their action takes place, where the other players and the Marshall will be and how to get their hands on the bags of cash and giant rubys that scatter the floor of the carriages. Of course it isn't that simple, because the other players can impact things before you even get a move, for example if another player punches you, you drop one of your money bags and and knocked into the next carriage. And the aggressor can decide which direction to punch you in.
It was a lot of fun. Soren was the first to the front of the train to collect the Marshall's bag, worth a whopping $1000, whilst everyone else was making do with the jewels and currency. Paul (2) did engage in a good standoff with Soren reeling of a salvo of several rounds. Chris seemed content to take it all in and pick up bits here and there. James of course was being wily and stayed at the back of the train whilst everyone else moseyed up front so that he could monopolise the cash back there. Tome was happy mid-train. Paul (1) went up front with Soren and punched one of his Ruby's clean out of his hands whilst they were wrestling on top of the train, using the deadly 'punch then collect' one two movement.
No one seemed to be too worried about winning, more enjoying the Butch Cassidy experience. Final scores revealed that Paul (1) had pipped James at the post by $50.
Final scores (not all known): Paul $2100, James $2050, Soren, Paul (2), Chris and Tom - all less than James.


Coup: Guatemala 1954
With the new and shiny being played by 6 players on one table, the next crew to
arrive pulled out Jon’s latest favourite, for a couple of quick games. This was new to Tom II and James III, but they soon picked it up and were attacking each other with glee.
Phil put in some early challenges in game 1 – and paid the ultimate penalty. Noel and Jon soon followed, leaving the newbies to duke it out (although this version doesn’t actually have any Dukes…) Jon turned around for a quick chat with Andy, and when he looked back, the game was over – apparently Tom’s Army laid waste to James’ characters pretty quickly.
Another game was set up, and this time it came down to James and Jon as the final 2 combatants. However, James cunning use of his Lawyer (take the wealth of any eliminated player) had meant that he had picked up a ridiculous amount of coins, and was able to coup / Secret Police Jon to his heart’s content.
Obviously a game for newcomers…..

Trains: Rising Sun (thanks Noel)
This game report is based on a true story...

Paul, Noel and Chris were keen to join Jon for a first play of his new Essen pickup, Trains:Rising Sun. It was Chris' first game of Trains but he looked like he could handle the Rising Sun 'experienced' deck and it was new cards a plenty for this game. Paul started in the centre while Jon took the NE, Noel the NW and Chris next to Paul.
Noel attempted his usual plan of initially ignoring the board and to Jon and Paul's surprise picked some of the new Attack cards that gave him points if the other players had waste at the top of their deck on his turn. Perhaps not a bad plan with Paul really testing the 'this new edition fixes the problem of players not playing on the board theory' by building everywhere and anywhere and filling his deck with waste. However, he did put some of the cycling cards to good use by discarding 2 waste to pick another card on most of his turns. The only trouble he was picking up more waste and cards that let him recycle it! Jon had a somewhat more balanced plan with some building and some attack cards. Chris also built to numerous stations and nearly built into Pauls high point cities in the centre of the board.
The game was approaching the end, Noel was close to joining into Paul's high point cities, Paul nearly had completed a long route that would have given him a total of 10 points, Jon seemed to be in the lead and Chris was also doing well. Paul could have taken a card that would then allow Jon to finish the game on his turn. Paul realised that if he did this then the scores would finish somewhere around Jon 26, Chris 23, Noel 18 and Paul 17


....so he wisely chose not to take that card frustrating Jon who only managed to pick up an extra 1 point yellow card. Noel then played from his final hand 2 attack cards picking waste points up from Paul and complete his build into Paul's 8 point city. Chris built another 2 stations and Paul did actually complete his long route on his next turn and finish the game. It transpired on final scoring much much later (maybe 4 days later) that Paul's decision not to take that card that allowed Jon to finish the game was absolutely critical to enabling him and Noel to get respectable scores, not be beaten by Chris playing his first game and ensure a 4 way tie. As we searched for a tie breaker all that needs to be said is that history is written by the victor......


Russian Railroads
“One-sentence Tom” reports thusly…
The game was Russian Railroads between me, Phil and Paul II.  All you need to know is that I won and that Phil will be bringing the "I defeated Philip Thomas at a Euro Game" sash for me to sport for the rest of the month.
 
Patchistory (thanks James)
So, the surprise hit of Essen 13 finally makes it to a table in Isleworth… the main question I’m asking is was the hype based only on the severely limited availability of the game last year (50 copies), or is the game itself a worthy addition to the collection…. the main question everyone else is asking, is will James share his plates of Sweet Potato fries, and can we be confident he’s worked out the rules correctly in advance (answers to both, probably no).
So the game works on a tile laying basis where you bid for tiles (2x2) and overlay them on your existing tile layout everyone starts with a 3x2 tile). Each square provides a certain type of resource and so the bigger the overall grid the more resources… but a number of rules enforce how you can build so your tile choices start to become strategic as you expand the empire. It’s a nice thematic match in that you are literally expanding your empire as the game progresses.
We were all new to the game, Andy (hoping for another variant on Through the Ages), Tom, James II(or Jim) and myself… I did my best with the rules (honest) and we started to bid and build… key early on was to add politcal points to the empire so as to activate a number of additional actions. Both Andy and Player Tom managed this early on but myself and Jim struggled and if I was honest, this felt like it held us up in an unbalanced way… I did spend a lot of time at this stage examining the rules to see what I had gotten wrong (yes I know, as unlikely as that sounds)… but couldn’t find anything… however I still not convinced…  So I went on a money spinning strategy instead while Jim seemed to struggle with a lack of funds. Andy and Tom has already ‘birthed’ some meeples and these wre now stomping around their empires adding additional benefits…
At the end of Age I (there are 3 in the game, how original !) it felt like Jim and me were behind due to the lack of political points. No-one had started a trade route yet though, and there was no warfare in place… something that felt like it should be a bigger part of the game but having played a third seemed like it probably wasn’t central as it took several moves just to get to this point. We also realised at this stage that we were going to run out of time (another thing in common with Through the Ages) so we agreed to go for a two Age only game… not the best option for Jim who’d picked up a ‘Wonder’ that gave 40 points if it was still standing at the end of Age 3, but only -5 for Age 1 and 2… them’s the breaks…
At the end of each age there is an interesting voting phase wherein 4 ‘bonus’ cards get voted one and the least popular is ditched… unless more than one are the least popular in which all get ditched. Andy decided in this case it was better than no one got to score any points so he manipulated the votes to ensure all the cards were scrapped… He’s a devious fella is Andy…
So Age 2 brought in some bigger and better tiles and things picked up. I decided at this stage that my main goal would be to explore parts of the game we hadn’t yet got to so my goal was to end up declaring war on Andy and to see what happened… to be honest declaring war on Andy also felt like a good strategy as he was winning… and also he was Andy, so this ticked all the boxes.
As you built up the patchwork empire each age restricted the size of your tableau. First age 5x5, 2nd age 6x6… so by now this created some very interesting strategic bidding as you needed to find tiles that fitted into your current setup. This part of the game is really the heart of the game, and it’s a great mechanic. If I’m honest I’m not convinced by the overall game, although the balance issues I mentioned earlier may have influenced this, but the bidding/patching/resource management side is a lot of fun, and a very unique element to the game.
So Age 2 progressed and I marched my army down the trade route towards Andy… others started to flex their military might this age and I was threatened a few times by Jim having to give up some hard earned resources…  I can’t remember much else to be honest. At one stage we realised Jim had built his empire illegally, but much like Russia we declined to take back the illegal territories and just redrew the boundaries… Finally my Army arrived, only to find themselves hopelessly outnumbered by Andy’s forces… so the war march became one of politely saying hello and offering to make tea…. Andy had none of it (maybe he doesn’t like tea?) and decided to push my army back… and that was that… to be honest the warfare bit isn’t that exciting after all the effort, but I think that’s intentional as the game isn’t really about that at all… else it would be called something like PatchWarfare, and Dan would probably own and love it.

Then we decided it was time to finish. Age 2 completed and we had another vote on the bonus cards… I managed to do quite well this time round, but not well enough and I think Jim actually won… I don’t know… we didn’t keep the scores. I’m pretty sure Andy didn’t win.. but then he might have… but I’m happy to stick with my memory that he didn’t. Let’s say that Jim won to make up for having a crappy first age with no meeples…
Feelings ? I liked the game, and the patching mechanic… but I’m not convinced by the overall package.
And I still have a nagging doubt that I got a rule wrong… however unlikely that might seem…
 
 


Resistance
Noel had vetoed One Night Werewolf after a bad experience in the US (I think he was bitten by a narcoleptic dog or something…), so despite Paul’s slight misgivings, the Resistance was tabled to end the night. This was new to Paul II, and Chris had only played it once before a long time ago, but playing the “I’m new and don’t know what I’m doing” card can often be a good bluff for a spy……
And despite being a newcomer, Paul II declared at the beginning that he had already tagged Jon as an amazing deceiver (a description that Jon took as a sort of compliment…)
Anyway, Phil chose Noel for the first mission, and also gave him a plot card that enabled Noel to look at Phil’s character – which he declared was a good guy. The mission passed. Paul II then chose himself, Paul I and Noel for the second mission, and Chris got to look at one of the played mission cards. He chose Paul’s, claimed that it was a ‘pass’ – and then the mission failed. So – Chris and Paul were likely to have the same character, but which was it?
Jon still had his suspicions about Noel, which were obviously reciprocated, but he picked him for the next mission regardless - requesting that he reveal his character card to Jon in return. Paul and Chris had both voted against the make-up of this mission, which further heaped suspicion on them as the bad guys. Noel took forever to decide whether to show Jon his card, which he eventually did, and was declared as ‘a good guy’. The mission passed.
With Phil, Jon and Noel all but exonerated as honest Joes (although Noel still had deep-seated niggling doubts about trusting Jon), it was only a matter of time before Tom was outed as the final spy and the good guys romped home 3 to 1.
The great thing about this game is that, no matter how clear the evidence appears, if you’re playing with Noel, Jon or James, then nothing is ever 100% certain. Fabulous.
Noel, Phil, Jon, Paul II – won. Paul, Chris, Tom – lost.

And that was it for another fantastic night at the LA. Hopefully Neil's oral issues (?!) will have cleared up by next week so he can join us too.....
.

Wednesday, 22 October 2014

What year is it Noel...?

.
Players: Paul I, Tom II, Tom's friend, Neil, Philip, Dan, Natasha, Andy, Jon, Paul II, Noel, Tanya, Gareth II, Tonio
 
A fine turnout of gamers, old and new tonight. After his fleeting visit last week, it was fantastic to see everyone's favourite bearded, pseudo-Italian maths teacher joining us for a 'proper' session this week - with the promise of further attendances to come. Hooray! He even suggested that he might bring Adios Amigos along again (which Jon was excited by - as long as 'quick-draw Dan' doesn't play...)
 
There was also a rare visit by Noel's much better other half, which occurred as a result of a mix-up with dates on a Michael McIntyre ticket. No need to go into embarrassing details here, but suffice it to say that Noel and Tanya did manage to get the correct day and month for the gig, however....
 
Tonight was the first session post-Essen, and with Neil and Philip both turning up there was obviously going to be some new fare on offer (although grouchy-Jon insisted on playing something old and comfortable anyway...)
 
Sobek
Early arrivees Jon and Paul set up a game of 2-player Sobek, but with Gareth and Tonio also turning up it turned into a 4-player game instead.
Jon shot into an early lead after the first 2 rounds, but then found himself the target of some bash-the-leader tokens courtesy of Gareth. Which meant that a large final-round haul of points by Tonio catapulted him into a winning position. Paul and Jon had promised to allow Tonio to win some games, as a means of encouraging him to come back to IBG more often, but I'm afraid this game had to be chalked up as a genuine victory, rather than a gimme....
The only thing about this so-called 'filler' was that it took ages to play (at least 45 mins), despite several encouraging cries of 'let's play speed-Sobek...'
Oh well, still a fine little game...
Tonio won; Jon 2nd; Gareth 3rd; Paul - way behind...
 
JamSumo (thanks Neil)
With the longest filler in the history of the club underway I gathered Dan, Tom
and Tom’s friend, sorry never introduced and I neglected to do so too, for the finger flicking fest of JamSumo.
In the Jam element you flick dice from a plinth with the objective of sinking it into the central hole of the board. Each player has six dice and these begin with a value of 4 each. As soon as one player has sunk all six then the rest add up their pips and the more of those you have the worst your efforts have been.
Sumo does the opposite really. You begin on the same level of the board and all dice begin on 3. You flick one of your die and must hit an opponent’s die or yours is removed. You’re trying to keep your dice on the board and scoring positively for remaining pips as soon as one player has been eliminated from the board.
It’s simple, fully interactive, beautiful and more than a little amusing. I love it!
 
The Castles of Mad King Ludwig (thanks Philip)
My second game, with me explaining the rules (although I had some help from Neil, who you'd have thought wouldn't want to explain them again after doing 9 hours straight at Essen). Other players were Arturo, Andy and Natasha.
The initial line up featured an underground room which no one could buy, so I naturally bought some stairs, and when I became Master Builder, listed the room at lowest price (it had accumulated 2000 coins by then). Unfortunately for me, Arturo managed a decisive combination by completing his foyer, taking stairs as a bonus, and completing a yellow room for an extra turn, allowing him to purchase the underground room from under my nose!
Meanwhile Andy had started with a Corridor which meant he could play and complete the Sewing room in one purchase for a net 10 points. This started a trend of Activity room collecting which kept him ahead on the scoreboard for most of the game.
Natasha focused quite deliberately on Living rooms and bonuses for Living Rooms- those he managed to complete scored many points, although it is tricky to complete them all. Arturo was more into Food Preparation and Sleeping Rooms. I picked up some of all rooms except Activity Rooms, with several Utility Rooms allowing me to collect several private Goals. I built a fair number of Corridor-Rooms, although not nearly as many as in my previous game.
Public Goals were most sleeping rooms (Arturo), most Activity Room square feet (Andy), most Underground room square feet (me, with Secret Lair and Venus Grotto) and most square rooms (Arturo).
Much to my surprise my Private Goals allowed me to squeak a win at 150 points, with Andy and Natasha close behind on 140 plus and Arturo only another 10 points behind them.
 
Stone Age (thanks Neil)
In the midst of time I used to hold down a job. Part of that involved selling
banking products to complete strangers and thus I had intense training in the arts of negotiation, influencing, assertiveness, product development, presentation skills, customer services and communications. Since zapping out of things in 2010 I’ve tried to leave as much of that behind as possible, let everything go, be a laissez-faire exemplar. No more.
After having five consecutive Christmas Days last week the exhilarations made me forget the severest toothache I’ve ever had and thus make my way to the Apprentice with a small selection of crackers. That I left myself open to playing Stone Age - as reasonable a game as it is - was gross stupidity on my part. I have lived, I have learned. No more.
The game passed me by somewhat. Inner turmoil pulling me around other than to pick up a few huts and some green laden cards. Paul in his first game scored very well indeedy. Gareth was tooling up and did some other stuff. Jon was commiserating with Brendan Rogers whilst stocking resources to hut up late in the game.
Gareth beat Jon by 1 point and I was about 7 or 8 further behind.
 
Kingdom Builder (thanks Paul)
As we were in the year 2014 not 2015, we were blessed with Noel and Tanya's presence. Tonio also graced us with a rare appearance, and so it was just like old time as Paul sat down to play Kingdom Builder with them.
Noel is usually a Kingdom Building fiend, so Paul knew he had his work cut out if he wasn't in for a trouncing, and so it turned out.
The victory conditions were Families (3 points for each settlement in the quadrant with the least settlements - meaning you need to get as many down as possible and make sure they're as evenly distributed as possible), hermits (1 point for each distinct cluster of settlements) and workers (1 point for each settlement next a castle or special hex).
The special ability hexes that we were working with were the harbour (move a settlement to water), the tower (add a settlement to the edge of the board), paddock (use a horse to jump a settlement two hexes), and an expansion which had two different ability hexes, which allowed a hex to be added to forest, and a really interesting one which allowed you to place a boat on water (with a real little wooden boat) that counted as a settlement, sail the boat three hexes along the water or remove the boat for future placement somewhere else.
The family and hermit points at stake meant that saddling up with the paddock was essential, and within the first few turns, we'd all broken in a steed and claimed this ability, which should have meant that no one got stuck in one area, although throughout the game Tonio's stallion refused to take the obvious path and so he did feel hemmed in for a lot of the time, meaning that our Italian friend suffered by only claiming few family points.
Conversely the other three managed a very even distribution, with Tanya scoring twenty four and Noel and Paul twenty seven points each for their evenly spread out tribes.
Noel was first to get all of his pieces down and had scored well in all respects and was neck and neck with Paul, scoring more on the workers but less on the hermits, and at the final count up, Paul was one ahead before the castles were counted. Tanya was a little behind, and Tonio was left bemoaning his stationary horse.
Whilst Noel had placed next to four of the five castles available, Paul had managed all five, courtesy of a sail up the river in the penultimate turn to a hex next to a castle that was otherwise completely surrounded by Noel's settlements on land. This gave Paul a narrow four point victory.
Final order (scores forgotten): 1st Paul, 2nd Noel, 3rd Tanya, 4th Tonio
 
Coup: Guatemala 1954
After a successful first outing last week, this game was brought to the table at
the end of the evening for some more bluffing fun.
Gareth agreed to play, but just as it was starting he enquired 'Is this like regular Coup then?' When the answer returned in the affirmative, his feelings of disappointment were obvious to all, although I'm not sure quite what he was expecting....
Tanya was the newbie who was treated kindly in the first game, and consequently won it.
Before the second game, Gareth saw something shinier across the room, so departed the Coup-ers, leaving just 4 to bluff and assassinate each other. The second game included a couple of interesting roles - the Army, who allows the user to assassinate a character from each other player, and the missionary, who can be sacrificed when needing to lose a character, allowing a replacement to be taken in it's place.
Noel took an early bath, after incorrectly accusing Jon (again!) but Jon followed suit after Paul decided that he was a more worthy target of a coup than Tanya. So it turned into a head-to-head, from which Tanya triumphed courtesy of the United Nations, which allowed the peace-keepers to protect her until she accumulated enough wealth to call a coup. Nice.
This game is definitely going to see many more plays at IBG (although probably not by Gareth...)
 
Also played tonight was Dan's new copy of Imperial Settlers, Nanuk and something else which I didn't see. A great evening's gaming - thanks to everyone who turned up!
.